As everybody
knows, child bully and many types of around scum bag Christopher Fountain was
once an attorney. He says he will have left the career for greener pastures
within the real estate business (which we could assure you isn't "greener
pasture" when you have a clue what you are doing as a lawyer). Not that we
needed any proof, but a little birdie sent us some interesting documents from
in Fountain's esquire days. Seems the drunk loser forged signatures and
submitted them in court. No surprise, then he files an incredibly entertaining
and childishly spoiled appeal on the grounds that he shouldn't be held
responsible or punished for his fraudulent actions because he was blackout
drunk.
This act earned him a three month suspension from practicing law. It seems seeing, that they should have received far more punishment. Fountain's excuse was that because (months after his forgery) he attended rehab, all his bad acts ought to be forgotten and forgiven. He further claims he was so incredibly drunk which he was completely blacked out and contains no recollection from the forgery. Unfortunately for crybaby Chris Fountain, that's not necessarily how life works. The Statewide Grievance Committee writes a reasonably entertaining and honest rebuttal to Fountains cries.
The defendant, Christopher C. Fountain, appeals from your trial court's judgment suspending his license to train law for three months. The defendant claims how the imposition with this sanction was improper because (1) the suspension constituted punishment and (2) the length with the suspension amounted to a abuse of discretion. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The following truth is relevant towards the resolution on this appeal. The defendant is really a practicing attorney who had been admitted on the bar on this state in 1983. In 1993, while representing complaintant in an arbitration proceeding prior to the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc., the defendant forged the signature of your affiant and then notarized the affidavit. Thereafter, he forwarded the affidavit on the opposing counsel inside arbitration proceeding. At the time with this misconduct, the defendant was determined by alcohol.
This act earned him a three month suspension from practicing law. It seems seeing, that they should have received far more punishment. Fountain's excuse was that because (months after his forgery) he attended rehab, all his bad acts ought to be forgotten and forgiven. He further claims he was so incredibly drunk which he was completely blacked out and contains no recollection from the forgery. Unfortunately for crybaby Chris Fountain, that's not necessarily how life works. The Statewide Grievance Committee writes a reasonably entertaining and honest rebuttal to Fountains cries.
The defendant, Christopher C. Fountain, appeals from your trial court's judgment suspending his license to train law for three months. The defendant claims how the imposition with this sanction was improper because (1) the suspension constituted punishment and (2) the length with the suspension amounted to a abuse of discretion. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The following truth is relevant towards the resolution on this appeal. The defendant is really a practicing attorney who had been admitted on the bar on this state in 1983. In 1993, while representing complaintant in an arbitration proceeding prior to the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc., the defendant forged the signature of your affiant and then notarized the affidavit. Thereafter, he forwarded the affidavit on the opposing counsel inside arbitration proceeding. At the time with this misconduct, the defendant was determined by alcohol.
Visit the links if you are you looking for more info in
regards to Chris Fountain Greenwich
No comments:
Post a Comment